Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Tasmania fumes over media misconduct

By Mark Poynter - posted Wednesday, 7 July 2010


Arguably, the failure of the media to at all times exercise objectivity, rigour and balance in the reporting of Tasmanian forestry issues has been the major contributor to maintaining a destructive conflict which continues to divide the island state. The media’s reluctance to fully utilise expertise that could easily defuse many of the issues being raised by forest activists should be of enduring concern to the wider community.

The St Helens water issue has followed the typical trajectory of media coverage of forestry issues whereby sensational and derogatory claims raised by environmental activism are widely and enthusiastically reported, followed by a subsequent reluctance to give equivalent time or space to government or industry views which could refute these claims or give them some perspective.

At the time of writing, the ABC has reported the findings of the George River Water Quality Panel in short news items and on its afternoon radio program, PM. This compares poorly against the one-hour of national television used to breathlessly promote unsubstantiated claims that have now been discredited. Surely, such an imbalance is unacceptable.

Advertisement

To redress this, the ABC must do far more than just apologise for unprofessional conduct. A nationally-televised program, such as Four Corners, is needed to tell the whole story of how the claims arose, were hijacked to unnecessarily alarm the community, and have now been discredited by an independent scientific panel. Nothing less will suffice in undoing the damage that its Australian Story program has inflicted on Tasmania.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

25 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark Poynter is a professional forester with 40 years experience. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Foresters of Australia and his book Going Green: Forests, fire, and a flawed conservation culture, was published by Connor Court in July 2018.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark Poynter

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Mark Poynter
Article Tools
Comment 25 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy