Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Ballyhoo and balloons: political elections

By Valerie Yule - posted Tuesday, 23 February 2010


Why do the political parties need their funding? To pay for their electoral advertising, the chief means at present of reaching the people. Why does this cost so much? The chief reasons are because television and advertising agencies are so expensive.

Do their advertisements tell the truth about the situation in the country and the policies that are planned? No. The advertisements are made with all the know-how of those who study what will sway the voter who wants to be entertained rather than informed.

We see this most of all in the United States, where only millionaires can try for the presidency, and balloons and ballyhoo are the hallmark of political rallies.

Advertisement

So why can’t television ads and advertising agencies be ruled out of electoral expenses? Then the money of the men of power need not be solicited by the political parties, to place them in their debt. Those who give vast sums to both the major political parties will no longer be able to sway an election no matter how the voters decide.

There will still be ways that money will influence elections, but it will have less influence in the Parliament.

It is economic to reduce the costs of elections. The cost of advertising in elections are becoming higher than a country can fairly bear. TV advertising alone makes Australian elections too costly for our economy as well as less democratic.

The result of all this is that we do not live in a democracy in spite of our desire to impose democracies on other countries. Yet there are many things that could be done to make elections as compelling in people’s interest as your favourite football team, and to make the interest of the people more effective in allowing them to know the problems facing their country and to weigh up the candidates’ solutions. It is also plain that these innovations would not entirely solve the problem of money influencing elections; there are ways and means for money to speak loudly. Nevertheless, every election could be scored out of 20 for how close it comes to being democratic, and the ideal would remain.

There are many steps for electoral reform where Australia could lead the world, as it has led before.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Valerie Yule is a writer and researcher on imagination, literacy and social issues.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Valerie Yule

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Valerie Yule
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy