Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Nothing to Fear From Reform

By Andrew Norton - posted Tuesday, 15 February 2000


This figure is particularly significant as relatively few students are likely to incur costs much more than the current top HECS rate. We know this, because there is already a completely deregulated undergraduate market for overseas students, and the prices they pay indicate that on average the cost to an Australian undergraduate would increase by $1,000 a year after deregulation. This would still put most undergraduates below the $5,682 annual top HECS charge, after the Government subsidy is taken into account.

The sensible response to what debt aversion problems do exist is not to cut off a source of funding essential to quality university education, but to persuade those who are debt averse that education is a good investment. Little has been done to show potential students how much their lifetime income could increase if they go on to further study. Once this research is done and widely publicised I expect it will reduce debt aversion, as well as providing others with useful information to help them decide on courses and institutions.

Moodie’s argument that reform is bad economics rests on the fact that Budget outlays would be less certain, as everyone admitted to a university would be entitled to a subsidy. He thinks the central economic departments would object.

Advertisement

This is at most a minor problem. The central economic departments manage numerous areas of expenditure that are not predetermined. We do not, for example, fix the number of old age pensions at a certain number and let the balance of elderly people go without. We don’t set a maximum national annual number of visits to the doctor and just leave anyone who gets sick after the number is reached to suffer on their own. Closer to the topic under discussion, we don’t have set numbers of school students.

While tertiary education is perhaps not yet as essential as any of these services, there is a strong case for at least offering everyone going to a quality-assessed higher education institution a loan, if not a subsidy. The central economic departments will learn to make reasonable estimates, as they do for many other economic variables.

Reform is not bad for education, social policy or the economy, but is it bad politics? Moodie claims that the proposals would encourage institutions with sectional and local interests to lobby government for private advantage.

This is the wrong way around. Sectional and local interest lobbying is what we have now, because there are no other ways of getting public subsidy. If the system were actually based on clear principles, such as subsidies and / or loans for everyone attending an accredited institution, there would be no need for such lobbying. Provided you achieved some objective standards you would get the subsidy or loan.

Moodie’s article is in the tradition of scare-mongering to stop change. On a fair assessment of the evidence, his fears are baseless.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Andrew Norton is a research fellow at the Centre for Independent Studies and Director of the CIS' Liberalising Learning research programme.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Andrew Norton
Related Links
The Centre for Independent Studies
Photo of Andrew Norton
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy