Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Online Learning: Rhetoric or reality?

By Geoff Scott and Shirley Alexander - posted Tuesday, 15 February 2000


8. Uses learning 'modules' which allow for flexible and multiple combinations of content to suit unique learner needs:

This contradicts learning research which indicates that active, responsive opportunities for learning not passive receipt of prepackaged information is more effective.

9. Uses CIT which is now powerful and reliable enough to support convenient learner-learner and learner-teacher interaction:

Advertisement

This is true but not for students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Wholesale application of the technology in this way is likely to generate serious equity issues.

10. Uses software which allows operators to monitor student and system performance in an ongoing way:

This is part of a teacher centred, transmission, compliance conception of learning and is contradicted by research on effective approaches to teaching, learning and assessment. Furthermore some students object to this level of surveillance.

11. Results in cost-savings: provides an efficient and cost-effective model for education:

Available data indicates that participation and retention rates for online courses in institutions like the University of Phoenix are relatively low. Our own research confirms that the most effective learning programs use CIT wisely and appropriately as one learning tool as part of a broader learning program. Therefore CIT is not a replacement but an enhancement to learning and does not, result in cost savings. At present the full cost of CIT use and support has not been determined.

12. Can lead to increased revenue - provides a way to expand enrolments without having to invest in bricks and mortar:

Advertisement

See point 11. The available data does not substantiate this claim. Attracting students is only one factor - it is their retention that is central to effective revenue generation.

13. Provides a greater spread of convenient access to a wider range of resources:

This is only true for the learners from more advantaged backgrounds.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Associate Professor Geoff Scott is Coordinator of the Quality Unit at the University of Technology, Sydney. His specific areas of research and writing are change management in education and training; quality management, evaluation, assessment of capability and effective learning design in post-secondary education.

Professor Shirley Alexander is Director of the Institute for Interactive Multimedia at the University of Technology, Sydney.

Related Links
Institute for Interactive Multimedia
Professor Shirley Alexander's Home Page
University of Technology
Photo of Geoff ScottGeoff ScottPhoto of Shirley AlexanderShirley Alexander
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy